Robert Miller Gallery
The Andy Warhol DiariesRobert Miller Gallery was a venue for Andy Warhol’s photography and a recurring point of contact between his art, publicity, and social world. In the diary, it emerges not through a description of its rooms but through the work shown there, the people who encountered it, and the plans made around it. A 1986 exhibition prompted Warhol to discuss the gallery’s publicity and space, offered him a chance to study photographic techniques, and later drew Bob Dylan to see the work; Warhol subsequently looked ahead to another photography show there.
A venue and a professional setting
On July 31, 1986, Warhol went to the gallery with Stuart Pivar. The site had previously housed the Andrew Crispo Gallery. The gallery’s representatives said they would provide additional space if Warhol allowed them to present his show of sewn photographs. The offer placed the exhibition within an ongoing negotiation over how much room the work would occupy, rather than presenting the show as an isolated event.
The gallery also had a public profile that attracted press attention. Steve Aronson was there reporting on the gallery for Vanity Fair, and had recently completed a piece on Pivar for Architectural Digest. Warhol observed a contrast between Pivar’s repeated presentation of himself as a private person who wished to avoid publicity and what Warhol perceived in Pivar’s conversation with Aronson: a strong desire for attention. The gallery was thus a setting where claims about privacy and the pursuit of publicity could become visible side by side.
The 1986 photography exhibition
Warhol’s visit let him look closely at another photography exhibition. He found its work interesting and considered the possibility of taking ideas from it. He particularly liked photographs by Bruce Weber that used dyed colors, including blue and pink, and noted the return of superimpositions. These observations register the gallery as more than a place to display finished work: it also served Warhol as a site for looking, comparing methods, and noticing shifts in photographic style.
Photography was already a carefully constructed part of Warhol’s practice. For commissioned portraits, he photographed a sitter with a Polaroid Big Shot, selected images for enlargement, chose a crop, and cosmetically adjusted the image before it was transferred to canvas and screen-printed. His assistants prepared colored canvas backgrounds, and slight misalignment between the printed image and the painted areas produced the portraits’ characteristic shifting effect. This process does not establish that the portraits were made at the gallery; rather, it clarifies the wider image-making practice against which Warhol viewed photographic work and exhibited his own photographs.
The exhibition’s materials mattered to him as well as the pictures. On a later visit, he and Paige found that the show looked excellent and that its catalogue looked good. His praise for the presentation was qualified by his dissatisfaction with Stephen Koch’s essay, which he felt relied on familiar references such as Duchamp and Brassai. He thought a younger writer might have brought in fresher names. His response distinguished the visual success of the show and catalogue from his reservations about the critical framing of the work.
Visitors, reception, and future plans
The gallery’s audience extended beyond its opening or immediate art-world circle. Bob Dylan came to Nell’s after visiting the photography show and told Warhol that he had literally just left the gallery. The encounter made the exhibition’s reach concrete: the photographs had brought a major public figure to see the work, and his visit became part of Warhol’s account of an evening among artists and other guests. Warhol also considered asking Nell to take photographs for Interview, although he noted that she worked only in color and left her black-and-white film instead.
The show remained part of Warhol’s plans into 1987. At dinner with Paige and Dionne Warwick, he discussed the exhibitions he expected to have that year: another photography show at Robert Miller Gallery and new paintings at Mary Boone Gallery, whose subject he had not yet determined. The diary records the photography exhibition as an anticipated continuation of the gallery relationship, not simply a past success. At another Interview dinner, Howard Read was identified as being from the Miller Gallery; Warhol noted that Read was temporarily staying at the Gramercy Park Hotel after his apartment burned and his cat died. The detail locates a gallery associate within the same social network, while keeping his personal circumstances distinct from the gallery itself.
Significance in the diary
Robert Miller Gallery connects several strands of Warhol’s later activity: making and exhibiting photographs, studying other photographers’ choices, negotiating exhibition space, and observing the traffic between art and publicity. The entries move between the work’s visual qualities, the catalogue’s critical language, press coverage, and visitors who came to see it. In this account, the gallery’s importance lies in that conjunction. It was a place where Warhol’s photographs could be presented and evaluated, but also where the social and promotional systems surrounding art became part of the story.